Authored by Rimkus Forensics Marketing Team
Published July 2, 2026
Overview
When the most destructive wildfire in Colorado’s history swept through Boulder County in December 2021, a large multi‑sport complex suffered significant smoke, soot, and debris infiltration, particularly within its second‑floor bar and grill. With concerns ranging from building envelope failure to potential heat and fire damage across exterior components, the facility owner needed clarity to support both recovery and emerging litigation.
Client Challenge
The client sought to understand how smoke and debris breached the building envelope, assess the extent of interior contamination, and determine whether exterior finishes, roofing systems, and concrete roof tiles sustained heat‑related damage.
Our Approach
Rimkus conducted a comprehensive site inspection of the building and surrounding property, focusing on:
- Identifying the cause and pathways of smoke and soot infiltration
- Evaluating damage to mechanical systems, exterior metal panels, membrane roofing, and roof tiles
- Collaborating with third‑party smoke and soot testing teams
- Leveraging expertise in building envelopes, window and door installation, mechanical systems, wildfire mapping, and environmental data analysis
A key challenge involved tracing how the mechanical system distributed contaminants throughout the facility before shutdown.
Value Delivered
Rimkus provided clear, defensible opinions on both liability and the extent of damage. Our architectural expertise and deep understanding of building systems enabled the client to:
- Pursue litigation against the entity responsible for the building envelope breach
- Resolve damage claims related to exterior components and roofing systems
- Make informed decisions grounded in technical accuracy and multidisciplinary insight
This case study is intended to provide general information and insights into prevailing industry practices. It is not intended to constitute, and should not be relied upon as, legal, technical, or professional advice. The content does not replace consultation with a qualified expert or professional regarding the specific facts and circumstances of any particular matter.